PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES – 4 The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith / Ecclesia Dei must begin a dialogue with the sedevacantists
23.03.2026PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES – 4
The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith / Ecclesia Dei must begin a dialogue with the sedevacantists
Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Archbishop Guido Pozzo and Archbishop Augustine di Noia do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so cannot begin a dialogue with the Catholic sedevacantists MHT, CMRI, MHFM and others who also use the same False Premise to interpret the Council.
The sedevacantists in Italy too must be invited to come into the Church since Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise is traditional and ecclesiocentric.
Also the Anglican Ordinariate and the new converts Mark Lambert, Michael Nazir Ali and Gavin Ashenden, must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
Vatican Council II rational must unite the ex-Anglicans and the ex-sedevacantists.
Also there must be a dialogue with the SSPX on the correct interpretation of the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Since 29Q does not contradict 24Q and 27 Q.
The St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire interprets Vatican Council II rationally and so Tradition is Feeneyite. But for the CMRI, MHT, MHFM and others, Tradition is Cushingite. Peter Dimond at the MHFM interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so he would be doing the same for the Catechisms.
Vatican Council II is Cushingite for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, the SSPX and the Anglican converts. It is Feeneyite for me and so I am not allowed to study philosophy or theology at the pontificial universities and seminaries in Rome.
FSSP AND SEDEVACANTISTS
So the Latin Mass of the FSSP in Boston is Cushingite, since the New Missal is Cushingite and the FSSP accepts the Cushingite 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, with its objective mistake, confusing what is implicit as being explicit.The FSSP interprets Vatican Council II like the sedevacantists.
Even if the FSSP used the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass, which is Feeneyite, they interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally. They are Cushingites.
They are not aware of this.
When the FSSP was pushed out of Dijon, France, they should have filed a canonical appeal against the liberal bishop, who interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally and not rationally. The people did not know about it. They simply protested outside the church when they FSSP had to leave. The bishop like the French bishops’ conference and the then CDF were irrational, schismatic and unethical on Vatican Council II etc.
Similarly when the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were excommunicated they had to point out that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, interpreted Vatican Council II unethically and politically, and was forcing this error upon them.
Similarly, when Summorum Pontifical was issued by Pope Benedict, the condition was that the Vatican Council II had to be accepted and interpreted irrationally and the liberal conclusion and ‘reforms’ had to be accepted.
Nothing was done when the Archbishop of Palermo, Italy interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and then had Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella, excommunicated, who also was interpreting the Council irrationally, according to his religious formation at the pontifical universities in Rome.
The DDF still does not reconcile them in Palermo, by pointing out that Vatican Council II has to be interpreted rationally and then there is doctrinal unity.
The DDF must also dialogue with the media (CNA, CNS, Reuters, and AP etc) and the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA. The media criticizes the SBC even though the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, there, accept Pope Leo as the pope.They affirm all the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, interpreted rationally.They accept Vatican Council II, rational and so are not in schism.
They accept the de fide teachings in Tradition. So they are not in schism on Tradition. Cardinal Fernandez cannot say the same.
A Catholic professor cannot be employed at a pontifical university or seminary. A professor has to be a Cushingite and not Feeneyite on EENS, the baptism of desire, Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other catechisms. This is even though the lex orandi over the centuries was Feeneyite.
AMERICAN RECTORS AND USCCB
The American Rectors at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, the North American College (seminary), Rome and the church of St. Patrick’s in Rome of the Paulist Fathers, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. For them LG 8 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions for the dogma EENS.
For me, they are invisible cases and so are not exceptions for EENS. The baptism of desire also refers to a hypothetical case for me but not for the American rectors. So the American Catholic community in Rome is divided. The USCCB interprets Vatican Council II irrationally while the American traditionalists reject the Council interpreted irrationally and go back to Tradition.
- Lionel Andrades
22.03.2026
PENDING CANONCIAL ISSUES 3 : Ecclesia Dei community Superiors follow Cushingite and not Feeneyite Tradition.
PENDING CANONCIAL ISSUES 3 : Ecclesia Dei …